yes she's indeed hot, not the daily blondy, very sexy![]()
![]()
yes she's indeed hot, not the daily blondy, very sexy![]()
![]()
shes hot![]()
sexyvery sexy
![]()
lol i bet ur girlfriend isnt 1 quarter as hot as herif u have one
Near at the border man!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
some of those pics are gonna be removed
sorry.Originally Posted by angel_gurl
wow. i'd be a good moderator! \/
you cant have manslaughter without laughter!
so the mods remove the not-working pics but keep those? what does that tell you?
credit to original scanners/posters/cameramen(!)...always
The automod is a piece of code that test if the image exists and returns an error message when it doesn't.
Otherwise you would see red croses all over the forum.
This feature makes the layout better.
none of the pics I see would break the rules as you posted them...I see no leg spreading, no sexual nature shots. Showing a woman totally nude, but not showing private areas, is fine. I've posted many pics of women who are naked, I just make sure the private area is covered or is blocked if I cant find one thats covered.Originally Posted by Mako
• HAYDEN PANETTIERE •
• MEMBER OF FORUM.SKINS.BE SINCE SEPTEMBER 2004 •
---------------------------------------
*Credit original capper/poster/scanner/site*
wow, talk about useless low quality pics.
Is there a post you dont complain about?Originally Posted by fookmi
How about you post some HQ stuff for once and stop whining.![]()
You definitely right. I take a look at his post´s...Originally Posted by Malak
Your all despos.
You all like low quality stuff.
I spent hours getting all the stuff I scanned looking decent for you guys.
All you people do is post LQ pics you find off other sites.
It's pointless.
does anyone have any other pictures of her, there's need more pictures of her. Not the naked one, I mean some of people might enjoy the naked one cos she's hot but I'm looking for the one that's more fully clothed but still sexy.
more pix pls...
Bookmarks